W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > May 2015

Re: UCR issue: phrasing of CRS requirement(s)

From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:23:23 +0200
Message-ID: <555A03EB.3020400@eurecom.fr>
To: Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au, L.Svensson@dnb.de, eparsons@google.com, janowicz@ucsb.edu
CC: public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Dear all,

> Oddly, perhaps, schema.org seems not to care about CRS at all:
> http://schema.org/GeoCoordinates

Not really, they rely on us! Please, see the current issue at 

> Can we take inspiration from the former one  (geo)  and admit
> alternative CRSs that must be identified by virtue of the ontology
> (and therefore namespace, assuming a 1-1 relationship) that is used?

+1! Note that CRS could also have stable URIs to use. The French 
National Geographic Institute (IGN) aims to provide such stable URIs for 
the numerous CRSs used by French authorities.

> This could do for  *referencing* a  CRS without ever needing a
> "default". For the *description" of a CRS, I would vote to defer that
> to the OGC by its existing methods, and I see no reason why that
> description needs to have a linked data representation,  beyond an
> ontology that permits its use.

Please, note that we have already a vocabulary for describing CRSs, 
based on ISO 19111. It is available at http://data.ign.fr/def/ignf and 
to see the description of the vocab in your favorite language.
Best regards.


Raphaël Troncy
EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech
Multimedia Communications Department
450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 15:23:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:16 UTC