W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > May 2015

Re: UCR isssue: Is provenance in scope?

From: Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 08:38:19 -0400
Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1790C98E-737C-429E-A990-FFA94E151D81@tumblingwalls.com>
To: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
Perhaps we can discuss the general issue of scope today on the call. There are many aspects of spatiotemporal data that in general are similar to issues with other data, but that clearly require specialization for our case. For example, provenance of spatial data must address not only how a feature and a spatial reference such as a geometry were formed, but how they were associated and under what assumptions for representation of the physical world. This is quite specialized to spatial and a significant semantic interoperability issue. We will miss addressing critical points in our work if we subsume them too often into general ones and deem them out of scope.


Joshua Lieberman, Ph.D.
Tumbling Walls
+1 617 431 6431

> On May 13, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have raised an issue for the UCR document: ISSUE-11 <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/11>.
> Again, all help in getting this issue resolved is very welcome.
> Regards,
> Frans
> -- 
> Frans Knibbe
> Geodan
> President Kennedylaan 1
> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl <mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
> www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl/>
> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>

Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2015 12:38:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:16 UTC