W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > March 2015

RE: Next f2f meeting

From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:23:17 +0000
To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>, Kerry Taylor <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>
Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <24637769D123E644A105A0AF0E1F92EFFAC935D6@dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE>
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:14 AM, Linda wrote:

> I could do either ISWC or TPAC, but prefer the latter.

Same applies to me.

Best,

Lars


> 
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org]
> Verzonden: donderdag 26 maart 2015 10:23
> Aan: Ed Parsons; Kerry Taylor
> CC: SDW WG Public List
> Onderwerp: Re: Next f2f meeting
> 
> It's also worth noting that ISWC and TPAC are *not* in consecutive weeks.
> 
> ISWC is Sunday 11 - Thursday 15
> 
> TPAC is Monday 26 - Friday 30
> 
> For those of us who feed from the trough of EU funding, ICT15 takes place in
> the intervening week (20-22) in Lisbon.
> 
> I mention all this because if the ISWC/TPAC dates were closer we could
> potentially have had the meeting in the two locations joined by video.
> If there is a location that a critical mass of people can get to, who can't get to
> Saporro, then we can have such a video link - but it's not as good as getting us
> all in the same place at the same time.
> 
> Suppose we had the meeting at TPAC Thurs-Fri 29-30 October and a video link
> to a meeting room in the USA (let's not think about time zones just yet).
> 
> Who could go to Sappro?
> Who could go to the US end?
> Who could host it?
> 
> And if that doesn't work, suppose we had the meeting on Thursday 15th - Friday
> 16th in Pennsylvania (i.e. overlapping ISWC by one day).
> 
> Who could go?
> Who would host?
> 
> (Incidentally, I'm discounting Europe as a venue - we did that earlier in the
> month).
> 
> And yes, our f2f meetings, wherever they are, are almost always 2 days.
> The idea is that each WG meets for the Monday/Tuesday or Thursday/Friday.
> On Wednesday we have the plenary. The 2013 plenary agenda [1] gives you an
> idea of how that day goes (I'm quoting 2013 as last year was abnormal due to
> 20th anniversary celebrations).
> 
> Basically there's a short talk from TimBL, some general W3C topic stuff, and
> then a set of unconference style breakouts (if you want to run a session on any
> Web topic, this is the time and place to do it).
> 
> I must also mention costs. TPAC is not free I'm afraid. It used to be back in the
> good 'ol days but now we have to charge $85/day - sorry :-( That's the early
> bird rate that applies to everyone, member or not.
> 
> Phil.
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2013

> 
> On 26/03/2015 08:38, Ed Parsons wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The intention is to have a two day F2F at TPAC. My preference as this
> > is a W3C activity is to have the F2F at a W3C event, but I appreciate
> > the logistical challenges.
> >
> > Ed
> >
> >
> > On 26 March 2015 at 08:34, Bart van Leeuwen
> > <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'd rather have it at TPAC since there is another WG meeting there as well.
> >> I have no business at ISWC this year and leveraging the benefits of
> >> being at that conference means paying the full conference fee as well.
> >>
> >> Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards Bart van Leeuwen
> >>
> >> ##############################################################
> >> # twitter: @semanticfire
> >> # netage.nl
> >> # http://netage.nl

> >> # M.A. Reinaldaweg 79
> >> # 3461AJ Linschoten
> >> # tel. +31(0)6-53182997
> >> ##############################################################
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From:        <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>
> >> To:        <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> >> Date:        26-03-2015 02:57
> >> Subject:        Next f2f meeting
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Telemeeting (a) this morning discussed the proposed location of next
> >> f2f in japan for the last week in october, with the w3c TPAC meeting.
> >> There were several people suggested holding it collocated with the
> >> iswc in the us, october 11-15 in pennsylvania, USA instead
> >> *http://iswc2015.semanticweb.org* <http://iswc2015.semanticweb.org/>.
> >> Several people suggested they could make it there at iswc, but not to
> >> a sapporo event.
> >>
> >> I am not yet sure what happened in the parallel meeting on this
> >> question, but there is clearly a demand for iswc collocation.
> >> comments? Perhaps a doodle poll is  called for?
> >>
> >> Kerry
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> 
> 
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

> 
> http://philarcher.org

> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1

Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 10:23:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:15 UTC