- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:00:37 +0100
- To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au, frans.knibbe@geodan.nl, public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Dear Simon, To follow up, as Kerry mentioned, most of the classes and properties have already a English label, you can actually see the result using a different viewer that our automatically generated HTML page, e.g. at http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl/#iri=http://data.ign.fr/def/ignf where on the top right, you can select your favorite language. What we intended to do is also to translate the comments, now only in French, and of course more languages are welcome. > BTW - I notice that you use rdfs:isDefinedBy to link from members to > the ontology as a whole. Indeed, we do. The tools we use tend to do something with this. > In the case we are discussing - which concerns traceability of > individual resources to their original definitions in a different > formalization - perhaps dct:isVersionOf, or prov:alternateOf or > prov:wasDerivedFrom provide more specific semantics. As you have said, the biggest problem is that the ISO standard does not give us URI to re-use and link to. Perhaps we could simply reference the appropriate section in the ISO document in each rdfs:comment? Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech Multimedia Communications Department 450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2015 22:01:08 UTC