W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: Working list of BP requirements identified during the SDW WG f2f

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:00:37 +0100
Message-ID: <550B4705.2010709@eurecom.fr>
To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au, frans.knibbe@geodan.nl, public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Dear Simon,

To follow up, as Kerry mentioned, most of the classes and properties 
have already a English label, you can actually see the result using a 
different viewer that our automatically generated HTML page, e.g. at 
http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl/#iri=http://data.ign.fr/def/ignf 
where on the top right, you can select your favorite language.

What we intended to do is also to translate the comments, now only in 
French, and of course more languages are welcome.

> BTW - I notice that you use rdfs:isDefinedBy to link from members to
> the ontology as a whole.

Indeed, we do. The tools we use tend to do something with this.

> In the case we are discussing - which concerns traceability of
> individual resources to their original definitions in a different
> formalization - perhaps dct:isVersionOf, or prov:alternateOf or
> prov:wasDerivedFrom provide more specific semantics.

As you have said, the biggest problem is that the ISO standard does not 
give us URI to re-use and link to. Perhaps we could simply reference the 
appropriate section in the ISO document in each rdfs:comment?

   RaphaŽl

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech
Multimedia Communications Department
450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2015 22:01:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:15 UTC