- From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:23:02 +0100
- To: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: SDW WG <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Dear DWBP WG, I would like contribute a few comments concerning BP-1 & BP-2. I'm cc'ing also the joint W3C/OGC Spatial Data on the Web (SDW) WG, since some of the relevant issues have been discussed during the 1st WG f2f meeting [1]. 1. BP-1 ("Document data") seems to mix two different requirements: (a) publishing data documentation (metadata) (b) publishing metadata in human-readable formats Is this correct? In such a case, shouldn't these be rather addressed by two different BPs? The requirement of publishing metadata shouldn't necessarily address *how* this is done. This would also be inconsistent with the fact that the requirement about publishing metadata in machine-readable formats is addressed by a specific BP (BP-2). 2. BP-2 ("Use machine-readable formats to provide metadata"), section "Intended outcome": "It should be possible for computer applications, notably search tools, to locate and process the metadata easily, which makes it human readable metadata, machine readability metadata." (a) It is unclear why this "makes it human readable metadata". (b) There's probably a typo in "[... ] machine readability metadata" - shouldn't this rather be "[...] machine readable metadata"? 3. BP-2 makes the point about the use of machine-readable formats for data discovery via software agents, including search engines. It points also to specific machine-readable metadata serialisations that can be embedded in human-readable metadata, and that are currently used by search engines to optimise discovery. However, I have two questions on this: (a) Shouldn't be a requirement for human-readable metadata to *always* embed their machine-readable version? This also when machine-readable metadata are available separately. I see a couple of use cases for this - e.g., optimising discovery via search engines, existing browser plug-ins able to read RDFa, etc. (b) Do you think that the requirement of being "discoverable" by Web search tools should be extended to data? BP-12 partially address this, but not explicitly. I'm asking since this issue may be relevant to the SDW WG - see [2]. Thanks! Andrea ---- [1]http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/F2f_Barcelona [2]http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Requirements#Content_need_to_be_crawlable.2C_then_able_to_ask_search_engine_or_other_service -- Andrea Perego, Ph.D. Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC Institute for Environment & Sustainability Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 21027 Ispra VA, Italy https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ ---- The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2015 09:23:45 UTC