On Tuesday, 17 Mar 2015 at 19:55, simon.cox@csiro.au <simon.cox@csiro.au>, wrote: Of course the fact that the classes and predicates have French names also begs a question. Unfortunately I doubt if it would be adopted broadly outside the Francosphere in this form. Simon. The URIs themselves seem to be based in English already and it would be straightforward to add labels in English (and other languages) so that shouldn't be an obstacle Cheers Bill -----Original Message----- From: Raphaël Troncy [mailto:raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr] Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2015 6:30 AM To: Cox, Simon (L&W, Highett); frans.knibbe@geodan.nl; public-sdw-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: Working list of BP requirements identified during the SDW WG f2f Dear all, > Err - if you dereference the example, you get a full description in GML. Indeed. > AFAIK currently this is the only public standard for describing CRS. Not a standard, but a joint proposal from the French National Geographic Institute (IGN) and EURECOM, the geom vocabulary for defining CRS. The vocabulary is defined at http://data.ign.fr/def/ignf. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech Multimedia Communications Department 450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2015 08:13:56 UTC