Re: Definition and Explanation of WG Deliverables

You too !

Cheers

Ed

On 13 March 2015 at 16:32, Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) <
Lewis.J.Mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

>   Hi Ed,
> Thanks for clarifying this. The fact that this concise response is on the
> public list is excellent.
> Thanks, have a great weekend.
> Lewis
>
>   Dr. Lewis John McGibbney Ph.D., B.Sc., MAGU
> Engineering Applications Software Engineer Level 2
> Computer Science for Data Intensive Systems Group 398M
> Jet Propulsion Laboratory
> California Institute of Technology
> 4800 Oak Grove Drive
> Pasadena, California 91109-8099
> Mail Stop : 158-256C
> Tel:  (+1) (818)-393-7402
> Cell: (+1) (626)-487-3476
> Fax:  (+1) (818)-393-1190
> Email: lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov
>
>
>
>   Dare Mighty Things
>
>   From: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>
> Date: Friday, March 13, 2015 at 1:18 AM
> To: Lewis John McGibbney <lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>
> Cc: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Definition and Explanation of WG Deliverables
>
>    Hi Lewis,
>
>  Very fair question, in the charter
> <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/charter> we have committed to produce the
> following documents,
>
>  1. Use Cases and Requirements (Note)
>  2. Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices (Note)
>
>  and then work on the following technology standards if they are proved
> relevant from (1 & 2)
>
>  3. Time Ontology in OWL (Recommendation)
>  4. Semantic Sensor Network Vocabulary (Recommendation)
>  5. Coverage in Linked Data (Recommendation)
>
>  The key work and that with the biggest potential impact is the Best
> Practices Document which will not have the status of a standard but may
> indicate relevant standards that already exist or where there are gaps.
>
>  Ed
>
>
> On 12 March 2015 at 23:59, Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) <
> Lewis.J.Mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
>>  Hi WG,
>> I was in discussion with one of my senior colleagues and he was slightly
>> confused (and now so am I) regarding the WG Deliverables [0].
>> It would seem to me that two are standards-based documents e.g. Use Cases
>> and Requirements, and Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices.
>> There are then two technology/markup related items e.g. OWL Time
>> Ontology, and Semantic Sensor Network Ontology.
>> Finally, the Coverage in Linked Data seems to be bolted on to the end
>> with no real obvious relevance within the purpose of a WG deliverable.
>> I am new to the Group so please excuse my lack of context. Can someone
>> please provide some?
>> Thank you
>> Lewis
>>
>>  [0] http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Main_Page#Deliverables
>>
>>   Dr. Lewis John McGibbney Ph.D., B.Sc., MAGU
>> Engineering Applications Software Engineer Level 2
>> Computer Science for Data Intensive Systems Group 398M
>> Jet Propulsion Laboratory
>> California Institute of Technology
>> 4800 Oak Grove Drive
>> Pasadena, California 91109-8099
>> Mail Stop : 158-256C
>> Tel:  (+1) (818)-393-7402
>> Cell: (+1) (626)-487-3476
>> Fax:  (+1) (818)-393-1190
>> Email: lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov
>>
>>
>>
>>   Dare Mighty Things
>>
>
>
>
>  --
>
>
> Ed Parsons <http:////plus.google.com/110553637244873297610?prsrc=3>
> Geospatial Technologist, Google
>
>  Mobile: +44 (0)7
> ​825 382263
>
>  Personal blog www.edparsons.com/blog/
>
>
> "It's better to be a pirate than to join the Navy."
>
>


-- 


Ed Parsons <http:////plus.google.com/110553637244873297610?prsrc=3>
Geospatial Technologist, Google

Mobile: +44 (0)7
​825 382263

Personal blog www.edparsons.com/blog/


"It's better to be a pirate than to join the Navy."