- From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
- Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 00:15:13 +0100
- To: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>, Simon Cox <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Just to let you know that I've added the relevant links to the draft agenda. Cheers, Andrea On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote: > Noted. Am happy to do this … > > Jeremy > > On 4 Mar 2015, at 21:07, Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com> wrote: > > The is no intention to exclude any technology at this point, the lightening > talks in Barcelona are to give an overview of technologies that have been > mentioned including those in the charter which not everyone is familiar > with. > > Jeremy is very welcome to add a 5 min talk on OWL time.. > > Ed > > Ed Parsons > Geospatial Technologist, Google > Sent from my mobile device, excuse thumbs! > > On 4 Mar 2015 20:59, <Simon.Cox@csiro.au> wrote: >> >> I noticed this in the minutes: >> >> KarlG_: noticed that OWL Time ontology is not an existing technology >> eparsons: no one has come forward to present on the topic, therefore >> it has not been included >> >> I had raised this with Kerry (because I have proposed an extension to >> OWL-Time to deal with non-gregorian calendars) but was told it was out of >> scope for this meeting, which is focussing on use-cases. >> >> I won't be in Barcelona, but Jeremy Tandy can present on my behalf if >> necessary. >> >> See refs here: >> >> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Time_References >> >> Simon >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org] >> Sent: Thursday, 5 March 2015 7:41 AM >> To: SDW WG Public List >> Subject: [2015-03-14] Minutes >> >> The minutes of today's meeting are at >> http://www.w3.org/2015/03/04-sdw-minutes.html >> >> A text snapshot is provided below for convenience: >> >> Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Teleconference >> >> 04 Mar 2015 >> >> See also: [2]IRC log >> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2015/03/04-sdw-irc >> >> Attendees >> >> Present >> Linda, eparsons, phila, YolandaGil, +44.792.021.aaaa, >> aharth, +1.857.919.aabb, JoshLieberman, Alex_Coley, >> +1.818.393.aacc, +1.603.897.aadd, MattPerry, >> billroberts, lewismc, +61.4.331.2.aaee, ahaller2, >> Ashok_Malhotra, +1.412.390.aaff, +44.775.388.aagg, >> KJanowicz, ChrisLittle, AndreaPerego, +1.650.724.aahh, >> KarlG >> >> Regrets >> Clemens_Portele, Simon_Cox, Kerry_Taylor, >> Alejandro_Llaves, Ioannis_Athanasiadis, Lars_Svensson, >> Erich_Bremer, Rachel_heaven, Jitao_Yang >> >> Chair >> Ed >> >> Scribe >> lewismc >> >> Contents >> >> * [3]Topics >> 1. [4]Issues around work to be done at f2f >> 2. [5]Agenda for F2F >> 3. [6]Conclusions >> * [7]Summary of Action Items >> __________________________________________________________ >> >> <eparsons> trackbot, start meeting >> >> <trackbot> Date: 04 March 2015 >> >> lewismc >> >> <phila> ed: Begins the meeting and asks for a scribe >> >> <phila> scribe: lewismc >> >> <eparsons> [8]http://www.w3.org/2015/02/25-sdw-minutes >> >> [8] http://www.w3.org/2015/02/25-sdw-minutes >> >> PROPOSE: Approve last weeks minutes >> >> <aharth> +1 >> >> <phila> phila: Apologises for last week's rubbish minutes. >> RRSAgent is running this week >> >> <billroberts> +1 >> >> <eparsons> +1 >> >> <ChrisLittle> zakim aagg is me >> >> <phila> +1 >> >> <MattPerry> +1 >> >> <JoshLieberman> +1 >> >> <KJanowicz> +1 >> >> <Linda_> I dont see my name in the Present list >> >> <ChrisLittle> +1 >> >> RESOLVE: Last weeks minutes APPROVED >> >> <phila> I'll add it Linda >> >> <Linda_> thx phila >> >> OGC Patent Call determines that these calls go ahead >> >> eparsons: new people on the call >> >> Alex_Coley: introducing himself on the call >> ... contributed very much towards this working group >> >> lewismc: introduce himself on the call >> >> <KarlG_> 1.650.724.aahh is KarlG_ >> >> Issues around work to be done at f2f >> >> eparsons: next item, spend remainder of call on the issues for >> F2F in Barcelona >> ... main order of activities to go through use cases, package >> them and group then in similar areas >> ... common requirements for best practicies in terms of >> technology scope >> ... looking at those technologies >> ... Yolanda has set out an agenda for gathering use cases >> >> <phila> [9]Yolanda's e-mail >> >> [9] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Mar/0005.html >> >> <YolandaGil> The organization of use cases for the W3C >> Provenance XG is described in >> [10]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Mar/0 >> 005.html >> >> [10] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Mar/0005.html >> >> YolandaGil: proposed an agenda for the Provenance Incubator >> Group >> ... how could we describe or highlight another use case and >> manage the contributions? >> ... so setting out a plan as described in the W3C Provenance XG >> document and the email sent to the list the strategy for >> accepting contributions and also managing contributions >> ... use cases are important to communicate >> ... create 3 sythensizing scenarios (flagship) ideas >> ... 1) general web scenario , 2) science, 3) contracts and >> industry setting >> ... has a team of curators who worked with the authors of the >> use cases >> ... highlight what the editors are after >> ... navigate through use cases to see what they highligh >> ... use curation as a mechanism for arriving at the threee >> flagship scenarios... this enables the group to work more >> effectively. >> >> eparsons: useful input and overlapping with the scoping >> questions >> ... how long did the curation process take? >> >> YolandaGil: about 2 or 3 months total >> ... this work can be combined with other work >> ... began to do other tasks in parallel >> >> eparsons: opening them up for questions >> ... useful for gathering and managing use cases >> >> ChrisLittle: when you were curating use cases, was it easy to >> extract underlying structure or was it more intensive task? >> >> YolandaGil: that was something that was constructed as a group >> ... once you abstract away from the use case into the flagship >> scenarios they become the groups scenarios as oppose to >> personal use cases >> >> lewismc: is there a template for gathering use cases? >> >> YolandaGil: yes, the template has dimensions which represent >> the spatial domain >> ... representation was something the use cases describe, but >> also where the data should be stored >> ... 3rd topic was how a user interprets data >> ... maybe some template of a similar nature would be useful for >> this WG >> >> eparsons: scoping mechanism is a good filter for use cases >> ... template to identify common characteristics from across use >> cases >> ... trial and error approach, we can iterate until we find a >> good fit >> >> <eparsons> >> [11]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/F2f_Barcelona >> >> [11] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/F2f_Barcelona >> >> Agenda for F2F >> >> eparsons: a number of individuals have put together what the >> agenda should look like >> ... think that the best manner to approach is to split in to >> groups then take one requirement for each group >> ... spend most of the day doing that with break for 1pm for >> lunch >> ... after lunch come together to derive common characteristics >> ... towards end of day run lightning talks for technologies >> overview >> ... hard stop at 5:30PM >> ... would appreciate some input on how to define subgroups >> ... opening up to questions and comments for the agenda? >> >> KarlG_: noticed that OWL Time ontology is not an existing >> technology >> >> eparsons: no one has come forward to present on the topic, >> therefore it has not been included >> >> <phila> Are you volunteering KarlG_ ? >> >> KarlG_: associated question, many technology incl, GeoJSON have >> deficiencies which may make their way into discussion >> >> eparsons: lightning talks act to get everyone on to the same >> page. >> >> <KJanowicz> IMHO the talks are just 'selected topics' not an >> overview about all details and all relevant technologies >> >> eparsons: will drill into more detail further down the line >> >> KarlG_: will not be able to make it so cannot commit to a >> presentation >> >> Linda_: ends at 5:30PM... is that not 6:30PM? >> >> eparsons: No >> >> Linda_: topic discussed at the end, thought that the idea was >> to look into general technologies which fit into the best >> practicies as oppose to other technologies outside of that >> immediate scope >> >> eparsons: lightning talks are only meant to getting everyone on >> the same page, they do not represent an exclusive list >> ... F2F meeting organizers are going to make use of GoToMeeting >> software for remote participants to participate as fully as >> possible >> >> <JoshLieberman> When you click on a GTM meeting link, it will >> download the app at the time. >> >> <phila> >> [12]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/F2f_Barcelona#Tuesday_ >> Evening_meetup >> >> [12] >> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/F2f_Barcelona#Tuesday_Evening_meetup >> >> phila: minor point regarding bottom of agenda page, Kerry will >> be finding a place where everyone can meet up >> ... location will be on the wiki shortly >> >> <ChrisLittle> +1 >> >> <AndreaPerego> +1 >> >> <JoshLieberman> The link to the go to meeting session for the >> f2f is already reserved: >> [13]https://www4.gotomeeting.com/join/353923093 >> >> [13] https://www4.gotomeeting.com/join/353923093 >> >> eparsons: F2F next week will be no telecon, week after will be >> review of F2F >> >> phila: suggests reading long list of use cases prior to F2F >> ... please check for day light savings time >> ... U.S. is changing DST, so please keep an eye >> >> billroberts: not going to be able to join the F2F, >> ... is it possible to submit some 'homework' >> >> eparsons: please put all on to the public list >> ... template ideas, general groupings, etc >> ... all to the public list >> ... these can then be taken to the F2F >> >> ChrisLittle: was trying quite hard to get a health use case >> ... possibly produce a health use case >> >> <phila> I added a medical use case this eve on behalf of Erich >> Bremer who has joined the group >> >> <JoshLieberman> There are demographic use cases with same >> characteristic >> >> eparsons: use cases gathering task will end shortly so getting >> them in soon enough would be great >> >> Linda_: upon review of use case, they all seem to be public or >> government... with no private >> >> eparsons: I have added some private ones... it is important to >> include these >> >> Conclusions >> >> <ChrisLittle> bye >> >> <KarlG_> bye all >> >> <AndreaPerego> See you in Barcelona >> >> <JoshLieberman> bye >> >> see everonenetxt week >> >> <KJanowicz> bye >> >> <eparsons> bye all >> >> <Alex_Coley> bye >> >> <MattPerry> bye >> > -- Andrea Perego, Ph.D. Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC Institute for Environment & Sustainability Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 21027 Ispra VA, Italy https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ ---- The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.
Received on Saturday, 7 March 2015 23:15:58 UTC