- From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:59:42 +0200
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 24 July 2015 10:00:11 UTC
Hello, I would like to direct your attention to a recent contribution that came in on the public comment list <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-comments/2015Jul/0001.html>. My feeling is that we could try to strengthen ties between our work and SVG a bit. I propose to include SVG as one of the existing practices in the Compatibility with existing practices requirement <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#Compatibility>, so that SVG is at least explicitly mentioned in the UCR document, and less likely to be forgotten about in the BP work. But perhaps there is more that we could or should do? As an example, here <http://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/3711652> is a illustration of relevance of SVG to geographical/spatial data on the web. Regards, Frans -- Frans Knibbe Geodan President Kennedylaan 1 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl www.geodan.nl disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
Received on Friday, 24 July 2015 10:00:11 UTC