Are we getting close to agreement in this thread? I.e that a CRS MUST be unambiguously identified for any geometric point, but that does not imply that we have to say how such a CRS is defined (and indeed we should not prescribe how such a CRS is defined --only that it must be identified). Or should we devote a meeting to resolving this issue.? Given that it obviously needs a lot of space and opinions run hot, I would propose announcing it a few weeks ahead and planning for a few identified speakers to put various points of view to the meeting. What do you think? KerryReceived on Wednesday, 22 July 2015 15:14:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:17 UTC