Re: [SDWWG] CRS Issues, Issue-28 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Are we getting close to agreement in this thread? I.e that a CRS MUST be unambiguously identified for any geometric point, but that does not imply that we have to say how such a CRS is defined  (and indeed we should not prescribe how such a CRS is defined --only that it must be identified).

Or should we devote a meeting to resolving this issue.? Given that it obviously needs a lot of space and opinions run hot, I would propose announcing it a few weeks ahead and planning for a few identified speakers to put various points of view to the meeting.

What do you think?

Kerry