- From: Thiago José Tavares Ávila <thiago.avila@ic.ufal.br>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:10:11 -0300
- To: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>
- Cc: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>, Kerry Taylor <Kerry.Taylor@acm.org>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+EBLKqcn0eyi_f67+pTzQZ18OpNCz+LOmiUkF+RGDOjeP8uAw@mail.gmail.com>
Very good Ed. Unfortunately I still cannot by audio, but I will participate by IRC from the next meetings. 2015-06-30 6:48 GMT-03:00 Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>: > Hi All, > > I will put this on the agenda for tomorrow's call, I would like to get the > input from the editors as to the best way to do this... > > Ed > > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 at 09:43 Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote: > >> 2015-06-30 4:52 GMT+02:00 Thiago José Tavares Ávila <thiago.avila@ic.ufal >> .br>: >> >>> Ok Kerry and Frans. I want to collaborate with these stories. >>> >>> If I understand correctly we may have a good narrative using some characters >>> (like Alice, Bob or Carol) crossing all Best Practices for publishing >>> spatial data and Best Practices for consuming spatial data. >>> >>> What is the best way to extract the best practices (for publishing and >>> consuming) from the use cases, considering the great experience of all >>> of you? >>> >> >> Hello Thiago, >> >> It seems to me that the best way to create best practices is to look at >> the requirements for the Best Practices deliverable in the Use Cases and >> Requirements document. >> >> One idea was to add a bit of javascript to the UCR document that creates >> an overview of requirements by deliverable. If the BP editors think that >> would be helpful I will add an action item to the tracker to ensure this >> will be done. >> >> As for the narratives, you could consider starting with a bare collection >> of best practices and add narratives that 'connect the dots' later. By the >> way, I think an additional benefit of storytelling is that it will be a >> kind of check for completeness. If there are holes in a story that could be >> an indication of the best practices not being complete. >> >> Greetings, >> Frans >> >> >>> >>> All the best. >>> >>> Thiago >>> >>> >>> 2015-06-28 21:45 GMT-03:00 Kerry Taylor <Kerry.Taylor@acm.org>: >>> >>>> I like this idea. We would need then two overlaid structures, pointing >>>> to the same underlying detail, rather like the UCR doc. In this case there >>>> would be more narrative, perhaps making it trickier to write so that it >>>> hangs together, but it does seem like a useful way to do it. Do you know >>>> those "pick-a-path"children's stories? At the end of each chapter the >>>> reader gets to choose from 2 different resolutions of the problem so they >>>> go through the story in different ways but they all traverse towards the >>>> same ending( ie outcome). >>>> >>>> Kerry >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 29 Jun 2015, at 1:34 am, Thiago José Tavares Ávila < >>>> thiago.avila@ic.ufal.br> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Frans. >>>> >>>> I agree about using stories to illustrate the needs of the users of our >>>> best practices. To be clear, at what part of the skeleton the stories will >>>> be written ? Will it be a running example, crossing all the topics ? >>>> >>>> Congrats. Thiago. >>>> >>>> IntroductionWhy we are herePrinciplesTarget audience (ie producers and >>>> consumers, characterised as discussed)Identity and IdentifiersSpatial >>>> Relations/ OntologiesGeometry and CRSAPI and Implementation services >>>> MetadataAspects related to Time, SSN and CoveragePerhaps just the >>>> integrated view of these threeConclusion >>>> >>>> 2015-06-25 6:12 GMT-03:00 Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>: >>>> >>>>> Dear group. >>>>> >>>>> We did not get to discuss the Best Practices skeleton at the meeting >>>>> yesterday but I did think about the item a bit so I would like to share my >>>>> thoughts before they fade away. >>>>> >>>>> The suggested skeleton >>>>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Notes_for_Context#Suggested_Skeleton> >>>>> looks like the document is going to be a collection of recommendations, >>>>> with chapters grouping together strongly related recommendations. I think >>>>> it could be nice to present recommendations in the form of recipes or >>>>> stories. Not instead of the suggested structure, but perhaps next to that. >>>>> >>>>> Two basic stories that can be told are: >>>>> >>>>> 1. How to publish spatial data on the web >>>>> 2. How to consume spatial data on the web >>>>> >>>>> Such stories could provide step by step instructions on what to do, >>>>> illustrated by examples. If such general stories will have too many >>>>> variations, some more focused stories could be told, for instance: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Alice has a data set containing spatial data. She thinks it >>>>> might be useful to someone, so she wants to publish it on the web. Which >>>>> steps does she need to take? >>>>> 2. Bob is developing a smart phone application that provides a >>>>> user with information based on current location. How can he tap in to the >>>>> web of spatial data and put the data to use in his application? >>>>> 3. Carol is doing research on global climate change. How can she >>>>> find and query the data that might be applicable to her research? >>>>> >>>>> Of course the collected use cases could serve as a source of >>>>> inspiration for specific stories. >>>>> >>>>> I believe stories are easy to read and easy to understand. And I think >>>>> that step by step instructions with examples are what many people would >>>>> appreciate. >>>>> >>>>> Next to stories we could have a comprehensive set of recommendations >>>>> on various subjects. That would allow people to look up information about a >>>>> specific subject. Such reference information could be structured according >>>>> to the suggested skeleton. From the stories references could be made to >>>>> those recommendations, allowing someone reading a story to drill down to >>>>> background information, if required. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Frans >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Frans Knibbe >>>>> Geodan >>>>> President Kennedylaan 1 >>>>> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) >>>>> >>>>> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 >>>>> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl >>>>> www.geodan.nl >>>>> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Frans Knibbe >> Geodan >> President Kennedylaan 1 >> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) >> >> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 >> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl >> www.geodan.nl >> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> >> >> -- > > Ed Parsons > Geospatial Technologist, Google > > Mobile +44 (0)7825 382263 > www.edparsons.com @edparsons >
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2015 00:10:40 UTC