Re: Spatial context

On 2015-02-19 11:25, Andrea Perego wrote:
> Andreas's mail gives me the opportunity to explain the objection I
> raised during the call [1] about the proposal of adding "spatial
> context" into scope question #1 [2].
>
> My main concern is that the use of "spatial context" in the scoping
> question may be confusing, and probably unnecessary.
>
> In my understanding, spatial context is specified through spatial data
> - i.e., it denotes one of their possible uses. So, "spatial data"
> should be inclusive enough - it would cover spatial data as a whole,
> irrespective of their use.
Yes, that is my understanding too.

Frans
>
> Thanks!
>
> Andrea
>
> ----
> [1]http://www.w3.org/2015/02/18-sdw-minutes.html
> [2]http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Scope_questions_and_Requirements
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Andreas Harth <harth@kit.edu> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the issue I had with the term "spatial context" is that I did not know
>> what the "context" part was supposed to mean.
>>
>> If I understood Josh correctly, he mentioned that a geometry,
>> a place description or a spatial feature should be referenceable
>> in data.
>>
>> If "spatial context" does mean that, I'm fine with the phrasing of
>> the scoping question.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andreas.
>>
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer 
<http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
------------------------------------------------------------------------