- From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 14:47:30 +0100
- To: Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>
- Cc: "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFVDz41yght7v1_Cs9UE4YeCQ42nXkLnvvA_drCY99yrhccH-w@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Bart, In the process of trying to merge the two texts I came across something that seems inconsistent. In the existing use case it says* "During emergency response operations in the Netherlands the only spatial data available to emergency response services are the predefined data in their GIS warehouses"* and in the new text it says* "During those incidents they *[emergency response services]* will use a wide variety of spatial data created and curated by third parties"*. Are the predefined data in the GIS warehouses of the emergency response services the same as spatial data created and curated by third parties? Or are they different data sources? I hope you can clarify this. Greetings, Frans 2015-12-26 13:46 GMT+01:00 Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>: > Hi Frans, > > Sounds good to me! > > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards > Bart van Leeuwen > > ############################################################## > # twitter: @semanticfire > # netage.nl > # http://netage.nl > # M.A. Reinaldaweg 79 > # 3461AJ Linschoten > # tel. +31(0)6-53182997 > ############################################################## > > > > From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> > To: Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl> > Cc: "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org> > Date: 21-12-2015 12:10 > Subject: Re: ACTION-85 Use Case > ------------------------------ > > > > Hello Bart, > > Shall I propose a merged text for the use case here in this thread? > > Regards, > Frans > > 2015-12-13 12:29 GMT+01:00 Bart van Leeuwen <*bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl* > <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>>: > Hi Frans, > > Sorry, I seem to have missed this email completely. > > Having just one use case who covers it all is fine for me. > How would you like to proceed on this ? > > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards > Bart van Leeuwen > > ############################################################## > # twitter: @semanticfire > # *netage.nl* <http://netage.nl/> > # *http://netage.nl* <http://netage.nl/> > # M.A. Reinaldaweg 79 > # 3461AJ Linschoten > # tel. *+31(0)6-53182997* <%2B31%280%296-53182997> > ############################################################## > > > > From: Frans Knibbe <*frans.knibbe@geodan.nl* > <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>> > To: Bart van Leeuwen <*bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl* > <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>>, Alejandro Llaves <*allaves@fi.upm.es* > <allaves@fi.upm.es>> > Cc: "SDW WG (*public-sdw-wg@w3.org* <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>)" < > *public-sdw-wg@w3.org* <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>> > Date: 08-12-2015 13:55 > Subject: Re: ACTION-85 Use Case > ------------------------------ > > > > > Hello Bart, > > I realise this use case describes something not entirely covered by *the > existing emergency response use case* > <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#UsingSpatialDataFromTheWebInGISSystemsDuringEmergencyResponseOperations>, > but do you think we could try to merge the new use case description with > the use case already in the document? As far as I can tell, the related > deliverable is Best Practices in both cases and requirements following from > the use cases seem to be the same too. > > Regards, > Frans > > > > 2015-11-22 21:26 GMT+01:00 Bart van Leeuwen <*bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl* > <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>>: > Hi all, > > As discussed on the call last week. > ACTION-85 is about best practices on linking WxS with linked data, I > created a use case to explain why this is important. > > Use Case. > > Emergency response services use SDI's to help manage large scale > incidents. During those incidents they will use a wide variety of Spatial > data created and currated by 3rd parties. Although the data provided by > these 3rd parties is available through standard WxS services, these > services lack the semantics of the thematic data. Currently there is no way > for a WxS service to expose the semantics of the features it provides in a > web of data way. > If WxS services could be extended to provide the references to the > semantic meaning of the features, the usabilty of these 3rd party services > will greatly increase. > By exposing the feature data as web data it should in the same time > increase the discoverabilty of this data. > > Requirement: > > Link traditional WxS features to their web data counterparts > > > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards > Bart van Leeuwen > > ############################################################## > # twitter: @semanticfire > # *netage.nl* <http://netage.nl/> > # *http://netage.nl* <http://netage.nl/> > # M.A. Reinaldaweg 79 > # 3461AJ Linschoten > # tel. *+31(0)6-53182997* <%2B31%280%296-53182997> > ############################################################## > > > > >
Received on Monday, 28 December 2015 13:48:01 UTC