Re: ACTION-85 Use Case

Hi Frans,

Sounds good to me!

Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
Bart van Leeuwen

##############################################################
# twitter: @semanticfire
# netage.nl
# http://netage.nl
# M.A. Reinaldaweg 79
# 3461AJ Linschoten
# tel. +31(0)6-53182997
##############################################################



From:   Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
To:     Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>
Cc:     "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Date:   21-12-2015 12:10
Subject:        Re: ACTION-85 Use Case



Hello Bart,

Shall I propose a merged text for the use case here in this thread? 

Regards,
Frans

2015-12-13 12:29 GMT+01:00 Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>:
Hi Frans, 

Sorry, I seem to have missed this email completely. 

Having just one use case who covers it all is fine for me. 
How would you like to proceed on this ? 

Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
Bart van Leeuwen 

##############################################################
# twitter: @semanticfire 
# netage.nl
# http://netage.nl 
# M.A. Reinaldaweg 79 
# 3461AJ Linschoten
# tel. +31(0)6-53182997
############################################################## 



From:        Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> 
To:        Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>, Alejandro Llaves 
<allaves@fi.upm.es> 
Cc:        "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org> 
Date:        08-12-2015 13:55 
Subject:        Re: ACTION-85 Use Case 




Hello Bart, 

I realise this use case describes something not entirely covered by the 
existing emergency response use case, but do you think we could try to 
merge the new use case description with the use case already in the 
document? As far as I can tell, the related deliverable is Best Practices 
in both cases and requirements following from the use cases seem to be the 
same too. 

Regards, 
Frans 



2015-11-22 21:26 GMT+01:00 Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>: 
Hi all, 

As discussed on the call last week. 
ACTION-85 is about best practices on linking WxS with linked data, I 
created a use case to explain why this is important. 

Use Case. 

Emergency response services use SDI's to help manage large scale 
incidents. During those incidents they will use a wide variety of Spatial 
data created and currated by 3rd parties. Although the data provided by 
these 3rd parties is available through standard WxS services, these 
services lack the semantics of the thematic data. Currently there is no 
way for a WxS service to expose the semantics of the features it provides 
in a web of data way. 
If WxS services could be extended to provide the references to the 
semantic meaning of the features, the usabilty of these 3rd party services 
will greatly increase. 
By exposing the feature data as web data it should in the same time 
increase the discoverabilty of this data. 

Requirement: 

Link traditional WxS features to their web data counterparts 


Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
Bart van Leeuwen 

##############################################################
# twitter: @semanticfire 
# netage.nl
# http://netage.nl 
# M.A. Reinaldaweg 79 
# 3461AJ Linschoten
# tel. +31(0)6-53182997
##############################################################