Re: Our methodology from Joshua Lieberman on 2015-04-15 (public-sdw-wg@w3.org from April 2015)

From: Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:51:27 -0400
To: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
Cc: Kerry Taylor <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au>, Chris Little <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>, public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <5C566EDA-FE33-4044-91F6-8C009C55B7DF@tumblingwalls.com>

This puzzles me. It is after all the deliverables that form the scope. Requirements that are not specifically “spatial” (e.g. valid RDF) may still be important for developing good end products.

Josh

> On Apr 15, 2015, at 11:34 AM, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
> 
> 
> There is also the matter that most non-functional requirements would not pass the scope test, because those requirements usually are not specifically about spatiotemporal data on the web. 
>

Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 19:51:57 UTC