[Bug 26425] Drop the default for [Exposed]


Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |---
                 CC|                            |annevk@annevk.nl

--- Comment #4 from Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> ---
Yeah, the problem is that specifications don't consider workers, or service
workers, etc. Not having a default would require specifications to consider
what they're doing, which I think is what we want. (There's also been some
confusion from developers in the past as to how interfaces end up being
exposed. There being an explicit syntax link would help with that too.)

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 15:54:08 UTC