Re: How to use [EnforceRange] with union types and enums from Anne van Kesteren on 2016-09-13 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2016)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:23:39 +0200
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CADnb78ihxJ-qF0YCR5ooK12AzGLbSsX4yfc0qdByS=hSoxdOQw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> Maybe the right answer is to really make range-enforcement a property of the
> type, nix the [EnforceRange] thing entirely and just have an "enforced long"
> type and similar for other numeric types....

That's what we ended up doing when we hit exactly this problem with
ByteString/USVString (formerly [EnforceUTF16] DOMString or some
such)...

-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2016 13:24:07 UTC