W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2016

Re: WebIDL crawler

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:47:35 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78i7LRE_+4mezXfKUVk7tGaVjsAziFNpZ5VJqgVg2tj-7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>, François Daoust <fd@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote:
> A question that emerged when we built the analyzer for the first point
> was which WebIDL names are "exported" by a spec (i.e. reusable in other
> specs). It is logically obvious that interface names are, and there are
> plenty of reasons for dictionaries and enums to be; it wasn't initially
> as clear to me that typedefs were, but usage clearly show they are (e.g.
> EventHandler) — which leads to the result that the very generic "JSON"
> name is defined (differently!) as a typedef in two different specs.

What's the other specification that defines JSON? I know Fetch has it,
but I'm happy to remove the indirection there since it's only used

Received on Thursday, 21 July 2016 10:48:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:25 UTC