[Bug 27557] Consider introducing a prose-friendly way to refer to enumerations


--- Comment #4 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> ---
Yes, that seems totally fine to me.  And will usually be much clearer, because
it refers directly to the API surface in an intuitive way, rather than
requiring a mapping between an abstract value and the actual enumeration that
was passed in.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 15:19:19 UTC