- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:52:32 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27557 Bug ID: 27557 Summary: Consider introducing a prose-friendly way to refer to enumerations Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: WebIDL Assignee: cam@mcc.id.au Reporter: annevk@annevk.nl QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-script-coord@w3.org Context: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27543 https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/ Perhaps we should standardize on a convention on how to reference an enumeration value in a way that is not awful to read. Fetch currently maps /no CORS/ to "no-cors" but that gets somewhat verbose. On the other hand, I'd rather not use "no-cors" throughout the specification as that is harder to read. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:52:34 UTC