Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 6/27/14, 10:48 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
>> [NoInterface] objects and many other things of WebIDL can not exactly be
>> represented with JS either
>>
>
> [NoInterfaceObject] is quite simple to represent with JS: just don't stick
> the property on the global.


If that's all it means, we should apply it to all the ReadOnly classes as
well.


>  The DOM has/(is) a binding language to languages like JS. You might
>> describe the behavior of the DOM as almighty.
>>
>
> We're trying to move away from thinking of the DOM in those terms.
>