- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:21:02 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24581
Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |domenic@domenicdenicola.com
--- Comment #7 from Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com> ---
> 3. An attractive name such as UnicodeString might lead to adoption in places that do not require it. String/DOMString should be used normally.
I just want to second this. As an API designer, if presented with the choice
between `UnicodeString` and `DOMString`, I'd probably choose UnicodeString.
("Of course I want to support Unicode! I bet whatever a DOMString is, it's to
support some weird legacy DOM APIs.")
I don't see why ScalarValueString is bad, really, despite the stated reasons.
But if this must change for whatever reason, it needs to sound "weird." Maybe
PostprocessedUnicodeString or ScalarizedUnicodeString or something.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2014 13:21:04 UTC