- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 21:15:45 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23369 --- Comment #42 from Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com> --- (In reply to Boris Zbarsky from comment #41) Sure, but this bug is about possible enhanced WebIDL support for ArrayBuffer arguments. Not every API that has an ArrayBuffer parameter is going to do the sort of asynchronous processing that requires copying. Unobservable copy the implementation level is presumably always allowed. My recent points is more about whether possibly observable copying is always required, even in situations where the caller knows it isn't necessary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2014 21:15:47 UTC