RE: Fetch API

For those who were not subscribed to public-webapps when that thread went down, here is the most convincing message:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0150.html


I was previously in favor of keeping things simpler by just doing ArrayBuffer, as it feels more right to have APIs accept the “underlying buffer” instead of “just a view,” but that message changed my mind by giving a practical argument why that is not tenable.

From: Takeshi Yoshino [mailto:tyoshino@google.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 15:31
To: Anne van Kesteren
Cc: public-script-coord; Joshua Bell; Jungkee Song; Yehuda Katz; Alex Russell; Jonas Sicking; Jake Archibald; Tobie Langel; WebApps WG
Subject: Re: Fetch API

For XHR.send(), we've finally chosen to accept only ArrayBufferView.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0141.html


Do we want to do the same for FetchBody body of RequestInit?

Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 07:50:33 UTC