[Bug 25986] Signify JSON as a return value


Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |robin@w3.org

--- Comment #6 from Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> ---
(In reply to Tab Atkins Jr. from comment #3)
> Agreed - having a typedef for "JSON" seems like it would make the signatures
> much easier to understand.

It wouldn't hurt if specs that manipulate JSON in memory (i.e. not as
serialised JSON) had some common terminology in order to do so. Right now it's
a bit all over the place.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 5 June 2014 14:10:19 UTC