W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2014

[Bug 25986] Signify JSON as a return value

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 14:10:18 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-25986-3890-wb2pg7CaLu@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25986

Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |robin@w3.org

--- Comment #6 from Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> ---
(In reply to Tab Atkins Jr. from comment #3)
> Agreed - having a typedef for "JSON" seems like it would make the signatures
> much easier to understand.

It wouldn't hurt if specs that manipulate JSON in memory (i.e. not as
serialised JSON) had some common terminology in order to do so. Right now it's
a bit all over the place.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2014 14:10:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:21 UTC