W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2014

[Bug 25495] Behavior of no [Exposed] on interface members is weird

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 04:32:32 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-25495-3890-78wZpe45UI@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25495

--- Comment #2 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> ---
Also, note that we disallow [Exposed] on both a partial interface and one of
its members, but do allow it on both an interface and one of its members.

That seems fine to me, for what it's worth; it means we can expose an interface
on both Window and Worker but restrict some of the members to one or the other,
while for partial interfaces that sort of thing is not needed because we can
just use separate partials for different [Exposed] values.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 30 May 2014 04:32:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:21 UTC