[Bug 25457] Adding "AutocompleteError" to error names table

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25457

--- Comment #5 from Dan Beam <dbeam@chromium.org> ---
(In reply to Anne from comment #4)
> Are all of those truly exceptional? Note that a promise should only reject
> for reasons where a synchronous function would throw.

Probably not, as cancel is a common case.

Does this means that the promise would be resolved in cases requestAutocomplete
doesn't succeed (e.g. cancel)?  I'm not sure Promises are a good fit for rAc if
that's the case (at least it doesn't seem intuitive to me).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2014 18:25:25 UTC