- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 13:45:32 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24959 --- Comment #8 from Christophe Dumez <dchris@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Dirk Schulze from comment #7) > (In reply to Christophe Dumez from comment #6) > > (In reply to Dirk Schulze from comment #5) > > > (In reply to Nils Barth from comment #4) > > > > Thanks Dirk: yup, the other alternative is to use a different separator. > > > > > > > > In Blink, we use | or & for separating (depending on which is clearer in > > > > context); probably cleaner-looking would be ; as suggested by OP, though I > > > > think a tuple with commas (..., ...) is probably clearer still. > > > > > > I fear that the grammar gets more complex. So far it is just Exposed that > > > has this issue (at least in the WebIDL spec). > > > > Actually, [Global] has the same issue: > > [Global=Worker,DedicatedWorker] > > No condition nesting so far. That's right. I was just saying that [Exposed] and [Global] have the same issue. I am personally in favor of using another separator than the comma. We use the ampersand ('&') in Blink and I think this is fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 2 May 2014 13:45:37 UTC