- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 22:03:12 -0400
- To: Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>
- CC: David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 5/16/13 6:52 PM, Sean Hogan wrote: > So what would be the problem if `setImmediate()` just appended to the > futures task source? None per se, except to the extent that you want to have different priority settings for setImmediate and futures or to the extent that you want some sort of ordering guarantees between setImmediate and something other than futures. Basically, the point of task sources is to take things that should behave in a FIFO manner and group them together. Tasks which should delay each other should go in a single task source, while tasks whose timing is unrelated should go in different task sources. -Boris
Received on Friday, 17 May 2013 02:03:45 UTC