W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: The Paradox of Partial Parametricity

From: Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@google.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 21:39:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CADjR9NrybKhK-dWhPm29rLQ03GBt2wAsnL45726Cd+e3=EN33w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Tab Atkins, Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, "es-discuss@mozilla.org" <es-discuss@mozilla.org>

On 10 May 2013 21:05, Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@google.com> wrote:
> On 10 May 2013 14:52, Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com> wrote:
>> An upper case type variable, e.g. T, is fully parametric. It may be a
>> promise or non-promise.
>> A lower case type variable, e.g. t, is constrained to be a non-promise. If
>> you wish to think in conventional type terms, consider Any the top type
>> immediately split into Promise and non-promise. Thus type parameter t is
>> implicitly constrained to be a subtype of non-promise.
> Mark, I'm afraid such a distinction makes absolutely no sense in a
> world of structural types. How would you specify the set of "types
> that aren't promises" in a way that is compatible with structural
> subtyping?
> /Andreas
Received on Friday, 10 May 2013 19:40:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:13 UTC