> Lucas Smith wrote: >> IMO, cancelation is not appropriate for promises/futures. (sticking >> with the name "promises", sorry for the distraction). > Agreed. Perhaps I'm missing something, but is cancel() conceptually different from passing a Future's corresponding Resolver around so that the program can invoke reject() at will? This seems like it's a new, "irretrievably broken" way to do something you already can do. -samReceived on Tuesday, 30 April 2013 18:01:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:13 UTC