>
> > Yes, sorry. It will on version 1.1:
> https://github.com/promises-aplus/promises-spec/#the-promise-resolution-procedure
>
> To clarify: in 1.0, the behavior of returning a thenable was highly
> underspecified, in part because of a lack of clarity about promises vs.
> thenables. In 1.1, returning a thenable is now specified in the same detail
> as the rest of the spec, and (of course) has accompanying tests.
>
>
Ah - thanks for the info. But as far as I know, you can't test the case
where a promise's value is actually a promise, because Q doesn't support
that feature. True?
The difference would only surface when testing that case.
{ Kevin }