> > > Yes, sorry. It will on version 1.1: > https://github.com/promises-aplus/promises-spec/#the-promise-resolution-procedure > > To clarify: in 1.0, the behavior of returning a thenable was highly > underspecified, in part because of a lack of clarity about promises vs. > thenables. In 1.1, returning a thenable is now specified in the same detail > as the rest of the spec, and (of course) has accompanying tests. > > Ah - thanks for the info. But as far as I know, you can't test the case where a promise's value is actually a promise, because Q doesn't support that feature. True? The difference would only surface when testing that case. { Kevin }Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 19:34:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:13 UTC