- From: David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 21:33:13 +0200
- To: Rick Waldron <waldron.rick@gmail.com>
- CC: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
Le 26/04/2013 20:36, Rick Waldron a écrit : > The libraries discussed in this and similar threads have the benefit > of very limited adoption, where breaking changes incur minimal costs. > jQuery doesn't have that luxury ;) [0] and therefore won't break > backward compatibility. I can assure you that we won't press for > adoption of our implementation as a standard—despite its more than > adequate qualification as a de facto standard[1] (like it or not). Which naturally leads to the question: why should platform promises be compatible with Promise/A+ and not jQuery "promises"? Because more libraries use Promise/A+? what about market share? David
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 19:33:45 UTC