Re: A Challenge Problem for Promise Designers (was: Re: Futures) from Kevin Smith on 2013-04-26 (public-script-coord@w3.org from April to June 2013)

From: Kevin Smith <zenparsing@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:31:46 -0400
To: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
Cc: es-discuss Steen <es-discuss@mozilla.org>, Dean Tribble <tribble@e-dean.com>, "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, Mark Miller <erights@gmail.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@google.com>
Message-ID: <CA+mDt2wPD4x119JPSh-bV6+EgvnF3WLQJfgkooyX8LRmWdhh5w@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>wrote:

> Yes, you do.
>
Mark or Domenic, is the point about Q true as well?  (That it could, in
principle, provide something like Future.accept, but it chooses not to.)

Just wanted to check before I say somethin' foolish : )

{ Kevin }

Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 13:32:13 UTC