Yes, you do.
On Apr 26, 2013 2:54 PM, "Kevin Smith" <zenparsing@gmail.com> wrote:
> What exactly is the controversy here?
>
> I think we all agree with the semantics of "then" as specified in
> Promises/A+. (If not, then we have a really big problem!)
>
> If so, then the only real controversy is whether or not the API allows one
> to create a promise whose eventual value is itself a promise. Q does not:
> it provides only "resolve" and "reject". DOM Futures do by way of
> "Future.accept". As far as I know, there's nothing about Q's
> implementation that would make such a function impossible, it just does not
> provide one.
>
> Do I have that right so far?
>
> { Kevin }
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 13:28:32 UTC