- From: David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:12:03 +0200
- To: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
- CC: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, es-discuss Steen <es-discuss@mozilla.org>, Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com>, Norbert Lindenberg <w3@norbertlindenberg.com>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Douglas Crockford <douglas@crockford.com>
Le 24/04/2013 11:27, Alex Russell a écrit : > > Sorry for the late post. Just wanted to agree with you assessment of > the landscape and options. We should not let theoretical purity poison > the utility of this feature. > Futures as currently spec'ed misbehave in the presence of objects with a "then" method which are not promises. Web devs will hit this and the bugs they'll file against conformant web browsers believing they misbehave won't be purely theorical. David
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 10:12:42 UTC