W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Coordination

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:46:31 -0400
Message-ID: <51682C57.9050209@mit.edu>
To: Rick Waldron <waldron.rick@gmail.com>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 4/12/13 11:41 AM, Rick Waldron wrote:
> I don't think it's unreasonable, I'm subscribed to (and read all of)
> both listsóbecause it's important to me. I doubt I'm the only one
> willing to bridge this gap.

I'm not saying it's unreasonable for someone to be subscribed to both.

I'm saying expecting _everyone_ to do it is not reasonable, given 
traffic volumes.

For my personal situation, I basically had to pick between es-discuss 
and www-style to keep mail traffic manageable...  I'm sure others have 
to make similar tradeoffs.

> TC39 and other participants of es-discuss will commit to cc'ing
> public-script-coord whenever the subject matter is appropriate.

That would be awesome.

 From the other direction, I think expecting W3C spec editors to cc 
public-script-coord on basic things like "here is an API we're 
designing" is a totally reasonable expectation.  In fact, I would 
support making it part of a FPWD publication checklist.

Received on Friday, 12 April 2013 15:46:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:12 UTC