Re: [WebIDL] cycles in [PutForward] chains

Glenn Adams:
> i meant step 7 (not 6), but yes, it is well defined, though sub-step 4
> of step 7 will take a while to return if there is a cycle (and the
> implementation does nothing to detect it)

Right.  But anyway, I concur with Tab and Boris -- we should be such 
cases as specification errors and fixing them.

Received on Sunday, 5 August 2012 05:00:56 UTC