- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 15:00:17 +1000
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, W3C Script Coordination <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Glenn Adams: > i meant step 7 (not 6), but yes, it is well defined, though sub-step 4 > of step 7 will take a while to return if there is a cycle (and the > implementation does nothing to detect it) Right. But anyway, I concur with Tab and Boris -- we should be such cases as specification errors and fixing them.
Received on Sunday, 5 August 2012 05:00:56 UTC