Re: Vestiges of [Supplemental]

>On 29/08/11 10:59 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
>>On 12/08/11 2:03 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
>> I tend to agree with Jonas. There's no point in hiding the interface
>> name from scripts, it's just a source of potential bugs and confusion.
>I agree here too.  I don't see any particular advantage from avoiding 
>using inheritance here without any messing around of prototypes.


This appears to be one of the only cases for [CopyInheritedPrototype] in WebIDL, and if we don't want/need this to be available anywhere else, I'd prefer not to have to support it.


Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 23:43:17 UTC