[Bug 13499] Introduce "assume-null-if-not-object" flag


Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2011-08-25 04:45:06 UTC ---
It wasn't clear to me reading through bug 13433 and this one again whether we
want to treat as null (a) non-callable objects, (b) non-Function objects or (c)
non-objects.  I've assumed (a) for now and added [TreatNonCallableAsNull].


Let me know if that works or needs changes.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 04:45:09 UTC