- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 23:07:39 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10623 --- Comment #11 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2011-07-31 23:07:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Anne's original reason for opening this bug appears to be related to > simplifying exception definitions for W3C spec authors. The solution I added to the spec wasn't exactly a direct response to Anne's comment 0. Since the solution was to move away from codes, I resolved it WONTFIX with comment 1. > What is the proposal above trying to solve? Is it that we are trying to solve > the ambiguity of exception codes? * resolving potential ambiguity of exception codes * making exception type discrimination simpler for authors and bringing DOM exceptions more into line with JS exceptions were the aims of the proposal. > This seems like a separate "problem" that I've never heard is an actual > problem...? The ambiguity yes, I will admit it is more of a theoretical problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 31 July 2011 23:07:39 UTC