Re: Non-constructible constructors and Arrays from Garrett Smith on 2011-07-30 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2011)

From: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 20:30:32 -0700
To: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, public-script-coord@w3.org, Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Message-ID: <CABZUbM2+JcZi7vzVsXDwbC6JKULmpKzZGMMAKhvTEr2bqbTofA@mail.gmail.com>

On 7/29/11, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> Useful. Feature-testible. Fallback is possible, though just using the
> falback would result in wider compatibility,

Well, not wider compatibility if used conditionally, but shorter and simpler.

Received on Saturday, 30 July 2011 03:31:00 UTC