- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:34:29 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12845 --- Comment #35 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> 2011-06-30 03:34:27 UTC --- > The more I think about having a derived interface affect something on the > ancestor interface No one proposed that.... the proposal was to have an IDL syntax for the derived interface declaring a setter on itself, not on the ancestor interface, while picking up the ancestor interface getter automatically. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 03:34:34 UTC