- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:23:26 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #34 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2011-06-30 03:23:24 UTC ---
The more I think about having a derived interface affect something on the
ancestor interface (making an accessor property grow a setter), the more weird
it seems to me. If we are to keep HTMLElement.prototype.disabled etc., I
recommend either making the ancestor attribute writable in the first place, as
Jonas suggests in comment 2, or simply adding a writable attribute on
HTMLDerivedInterface as needed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 03:23:27 UTC