[Bug 11267] Add a [NonConfigurable] extended attribute


--- Comment #11 from Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> 2011-06-24 01:55:46 UTC ---
Sorry to bikeshed, but isn't the bigger effect that [NonConfigureable] has the
fact that it moves the property from the prototype to the leaf object? If so,
wouldn't something like [LeafProperty] or [ObjectProperty] be a better name?

Also, what happens for if something has [NonConfigureable] (or [LeafProperty]
or [ObjectProperty] or whatever) but isn't marked as readonly? Is that invalid
IDL or does that have some meaning?

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 01:55:48 UTC