[Bug 11267] Add a [NonConfigurable] extended attribute

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11267

--- Comment #10 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2011-06-24 00:36:54 UTC ---
I've come around to the idea that this should be specified in Web IDL.

Proposal: make

  interface A {
    [NonConfigurable] readonly attribute Type name;
  };

mean that there is no property "name" on A.prototype, but there is an own
non-configurable property "name" on every A instance.  (We'll work under the
assumption that the proxies will support this.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 00:36:56 UTC