- From: Travis Leithead <Travis.Leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:32:23 +0000
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
- CC: "Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc)" <jonas@sicking.cc>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
I was reviewing browser Interop for the following scenario, and want to get your take on the matter (because some recent W3C test submissions are exercising these assumptions and IE is considering changing our implementation): var original = Node.ELEMENT_NODE; Node.ELEMENT_NODE = "ten"; var check = Node.ELEMENT_NODE; if (original !== check) alert("const properties aren't constant"); else alert("const properties can't be written"); Tested__ Result__ WebIDL not writable Opera not writable IE9 writable FF4 writable Chrome7 not writable Safari5 not writable Any objections if IE9 changes to not writable? I presume FF would also eventually change? Is there a web compatibility reason for not doing this? -Travis
Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2010 20:32:58 UTC