Re: [WebIDL] ES5 alignment: IE9's readonly and WebIDL configurable attribute

Hi Travis.

Travis Leithead:
> The issues are:
> 1. The interpretation of 'readonly' in WebIDL syntax

I think it’s fine to point that out in the spec.  Raised a bug for that:

  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11175

> 2. The configurability of global properties that reference interface objects

Your argument makes sense, and consistency with built-in JS constructor objects
would be good.  I suspect I just chose to make the non-configurable
because that’s what browsers do at the moment.

Raised a bug for that too:

  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11176

Other opinions welcome…

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Saturday, 30 October 2010 02:37:49 UTC