- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:25:07 +1300
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
- Cc: jhartman@google.com
Jed Hartman: > I have one tiny nitpicky comment about something that caught my eye in > passing. The spec says: > > > The keywords “must”, “must not”, “required”, “shall”, “shall not”, > > “recommended”, “may” and “optional” in this document are to be > > interpreted as described in Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate > > Requirement Levels [RFC2119]. > > I'm thinking that "SHOULD" and "SHOULD NOT" should be added to that > list (right after "SHALL" and "SHALL NOT"). Fixed, thanks! -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Friday, 8 October 2010 05:25:46 UTC