W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Web IDL Garden Hose

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:18:15 -0700
Cc: Allen Wirfs-Brock <Allen.Wirfs-Brock@microsoft.com>, public-script-coord@w3.org, "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, es-discuss Steen <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
Message-id: <7C0DA9F3-1A10-4790-A44E-D7B4F64B3589@apple.com>
To: Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>


(Soon I will start dropping es-discuss too).

On Sep 29, 2009, at 3:38 AM, Yehuda Katz wrote:

> I meant "actually written". Being able to see actual code that  
> implemented pieces of the IDL in ES would make some of the more  
> complex interactions more obvious (I suspect).

I don't entirely understand this request. The IDL just defines an  
interface. ECMAScript doesn't have a way to declare an interface  
without implementing it. And the actual behavior of most objects  
described with Web IDL interfaces is not implementable in pure  
ECMAScript - not the interface behavior, the actual core behavior. But  
maybe you can help me understand what you want with an example. Here's  
a trivial Web IDL interface, what would count as an ES implementation  
to you:

interface FooBar {
     boolean isFoo(DOMString a, long b);
     boolean isBar(DOMString a, long b);

Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 04:18:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:01 UTC